20-21 March 2020 International Graduate Student Group Workshop

 



             Aquinas,                   Alfarabi,                           Avicenna,         Averroes,       Maimonides  &    Albertus



Eighth Annual AAIWG On-Line International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop


20-21 March 2020

Location: Raynor Memorial Library,

3rd Floor, room 320a


All times indicated are US Central Time.


































++++++++++++++++++++++++


Seventh Annual AAIWG On-Line International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop


22-23 March 2019


Location: Raynor Memorial Library,

3rd Floor, room 320a


All times indicated are US Central Time.










































++++++++++++++++++++++++


Sixth Annual AAIWG On-line International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop


23-24 March 2018

Location: Raynor Memorial Library,

3rd Floor, room 320a


All times indicated are US Central Time.


          Welcome to the “Sixth Annual On-line International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop” taking place on 23-24 March 2018. This workshop is designed to give graduate students working on Aquinas, Medieval Arabic philosophy, and the interaction between Aquinas and his predecessors in the Muslim world an opportunity to share their own research. For this reason the format is a bit unique. First, the workshop primarily takes place over Skype, to reduce cost and allow student colleagues from around the globe to participate. Second, rather than full live paper presentations, our presenters have submitted their papers for distribution to participants in March, to be read in advance of the workshop. The workshop presentations begin with a short introduction on key issues by the presenter with the rest of the time devoted to discussion and questions. Participants are encouraged to come with questions ready, and if possible, to have relevant texts on hand.  Non-presenting attendees interested in receiving copies of any of our presenter’s papers (not for distribution or quotation), please email muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com. We are pleased to have a wide variety of topics this year. We look forward this event.


For further information, write to muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com.


Note: All times are US Central Time


Skype connection 10-15 min. before each session.


Friday 23 March


09:00-9:55 – Vladimir Lasica (Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey): Avicenna’s ontological proof


10:00-10:55 - Celia Byrne (U of T, Toronto, Canada): Ibn Sina on the Necessity of Change


10:55-11:10 - BREAK

 

11:10-12:05 - Ellen DeDoncker (KUL, Belgium): Avicenna: Divine Freedom in Creation


12:05-1:00 - Elias Hage (KUL, Belgium): Two Forms of Necessity: A Foundation for the Disagreement  between Avicenna and Aquinas on the Eternity of the World


01:00-2:15 – LUNCH

 

2:15-3:10 - Brett Yardley (Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin USA): Biblical Inspiration & Islamic "Instrumental Causality": Aquinas on the two authors of Sacred Scripture


3:15-4:10 - Nathaniel Taylor (Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin USA): The “Is” of Truth and the “Is It?” Question: Critical Notes on Dewan


4:15-5:10 – Thao Nguyen (University of St. Thomas, Houston,TX): The Divine Exemplars as Key to Thomas Aquinas’ Contra-Avicenna Solution for the Problem of God’s Knowledge of Singulars


Saturday 24 March


10:10-11:05 - Gianmaria Dani (Padova, Italy): The role of the noble lie as a venial sin in Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae


11:10-12:05 - Jonathan Culbreath (KUL, Belgium): Abstraction and Illumination in Thomas Aquinas: Agent Intellect as a Participation in Divine Light.


12:10-01:15 - Tracy Wietecha (Universität Munich, Germany): Can the Non-Political Person be Happy?: Averroes and Albert the Great on Dispositions and Virtue










++++++++++++


Many thanks to the organizers and participants

in a very successful and intellectually stimulating

meeting on Friday 10 February 2017.


Fifth Annual AAIWG On-line International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop


10 February 2017. Deadlines: Participants should submit a 250 word abstract and Current CV by January 9. Full papers of accepted abstracts should be submitted by February 2. Presenters will have their papers distributed to participants in advance. All participants must read these papers prior to the workshop. Forward submissions to: muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com. For more information, please see attached flyer."


Location: Raynor Memorial Library,

3rd Floor, room 320a

All times indicated are US Central Time.


          Welcome to the “Fifth Annual On-line International Live Video Graduate Student Workshop” taking place on 10 February, 2017. This workshop is designed to give graduate students working on Aquinas, Medieval Arabic philosophy, and the interaction between Aquinas and his predecessors in the Muslim world a space to delve deeply into students’ own research. For this reason the format is a bit unique. First, the workshop primarily takes place over Skype, to reduce cost and allow colleagues from around the globe to participate. Second, rather than full live paper presentations, our presenters will submit their papers for distribution to participants in February, to be read in advance of the workshop. The workshop itself will allow substantial discussion, with a short introduction by the presenter and the rest of the time devoted to questions. Participants are encouraged to come with questions ready, and if possible, to have relevant texts on hand.  If you are interested in receiving copies of any of our presenter’s papers (not for distribution or quotation), please email muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com. We are pleased to have a wide variety of topics this year, including: an exploration of Aquinas’ concept of Imago Dei, al-Ghazali’s innovative epistemology, Thomas’s conditions for science, and a comparison of Aquinas and Avicenna on Divine Will. We look forward to you joining us!

All times are US Central Time


Skype connection at 7:45. Please be prepared.

If connecting via Skype, email Richard.Taylor@Marquette.edu for instructions


Friday 10 February


8:00 AM   Welcome


8:05 AM   Nathaniel Taylor, Marquette University

Scientia contra Inscitiam: Thomas Aquinas, Essentialism, and Two Theories of Necessity”


9:00 AM  Issabella Cardu, University of Durham, UK

“Aquinas on the Imago Dei: An Inclusive Essentialist Account?”


10:00 AM   Brett Yardley, Marquette University

“al-Ghazali the Anachronistic Philosopher”


11:00 PM    Mark Schulz, Marquette University

“Avicenna and Aquinas on Divine Will”


================================




Fourth On-Line International Live Video AAIWG Graduate Student Group Workshop

19 February 2016


Location: Raynor Memorial Library,

3rd Floor, room 320a


Skype connection at 8:45. Please be prepared.


9:00 AM   Welcome


9:10 AM   “Thomas and the Creative Knowledge of God”

       James Wetzel, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven


10:20 AM “Plotinus and Avicenna on Divine Will”

       Mark Schulz, Marquette University


11:30 AM  "Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Logical Mode in Metaphysics: Demonstrative or Dialectical?”

      Gaston LeNotre, Catholic University of America


12:35 PM   Lunch


1:45 PM    “Justice for the Other: Aquinas and Maimonides on the Treatment of Religious Minorities” Nick Oschman, Marquette University


2:55 PM    “Al-Ghazālī the Anachronistic Philosopher: Medieval Analytic Philosophy of Religion Introduction” Brett Yardley, Marquette University



Call for Abstracts



Application Procedure


Those interested in presenting must submit a 150 word abstract for a  ca. 4000-5000 word essay, notes separate,  by TBA. (DEADLINE). Papers may be on (i) Aquinas, (ii) Medieval Arabic philosophy, (iii) intersections between the two, or (iv) related topics. All submissions and comments must be in English.


Students with accepted abstracts will be notified on TBA.

Complete papers must be submitted no later than TBA.

Please enter “Aquinas and the Arabs Graduate Conference Submission” in the subject-line of the e-mail.


All applications must be accompanied by a CV.



Format, or How to Participate as a Presenter


Papers will be distributed to participants on TBA. Presenters will have no more than 5-7 min. to present brief remarks indicating some of the key issues on which s/he would like discussion. The remaining time will be devoted to questions and comments by participants present online or in person. There will be a 5 min. break between presentations and a 90 min. break for lunch on Friday and Saturday.


Full papers will not be read at the Workshop. Presenters will have 7 minutes to indicate parts or issues of the paper on which they would like to receive comments or discussion.  Then the floor will be open for questions from any participants.

We intend to use Skype with Google Hangouts as a backup in case of problems. All participants and attendees should have Google Chrome and gmail accounts in case we need to turn to Google Hangouts.

Participants not physically present at Marquette University for this event should indicate the desire to ask a question by sending a text message to Marquette organizers from inside Skype.

NOTE: ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST AGREE TO READ EACH OF THE CONFERENCE PAPERS. Again, note that papers will not be read at the conference since they are being distributed in advance to all participants. This will allow for more valuable discussion of the papers.



Requirements for those attending as observers

All observers should register via email at www.aquinasandthearabs.org.

Observers may request copies of the papers to prepare for the conference. Send your request to the email address mentioned immediately above. No papers will be distributed after TBA.



Required Technology Test


Take Special Note: All presenters will need to set up a test connection with Marquette on DATE TBA. We will use Skype technology. Participants need only have a computer (Mac or PC) with camera and a fast internet connection (university campus ethernet preferred) as well as Skype installed.

The Tech Test will take place at DATE TBA.


E-mail abstracts, completed papers and interest in commenting to:


muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com



Conference Organizer: Nicholas Oschman (Nicholas.Oschman@Marquette.edu) &

Dr. Richard C. Taylor—Faculty Advisor—richard.taylor@marquette.edu


www.aquinasandthearabs.org




--------------

Thanks to all participants for another fine meeting with excellent discussions.

Special thanks to Nick Oschman who handled the technology for the event. Other help by Traci Phillipson, Tracy Wietecha and Evan Williams is also gratefully acknowledge.

Richard Taylor 28 February 2015


Third On-Line International Live Video Graduate Student Group Workshop

20-21 February 2015*



(*Those whose papers are accepted for the Workshop are awarded a

free one year membership in the Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy.)


Call for Abstracts


Members of the Marquette Chapter of the Aquinas and the ‘Arabs’ International Working Group will be hosting an online graduate student conference on 20-21 February 2015.


Application Procedure


Those interested in presenting must submit a 150 word abstract for a  ca. 4000-5000 word essay, notes separate,  by 22 January 2015. (DEADLINE). Papers may be on (i) Aquinas, (ii) Medieval Arabic philosophy, (iii) intersections between the two, or (iv) related topics. All submissions and comments must be in English.


Students with accepted abstracts will be notified on 26 January 2015.

Complete papers must be submitted no later than 8 February 2015.

Please enter “Aquinas and the Arabs Graduate Conference Submission” in the subject-line of the e-mail.


All applications must be accompanied by a CV.



Format, or How to Participate as a Presenter


Papers will be distributed to participants on 8 February 2015. Presenters will have no more than 5-7 min. to present brief remarks indicating some of the key issues on which s/he would like discussion. The remaining time will be devoted to questions and comments by participants present online or in person. There will be a 5 min. break between presentations and a 90 min. break for lunch on Friday and Saturday.


Full papers will not be read at the Workshop. Presenters will have 7 minutes to indicate parts or issues of the paper on which they would like to receive comments or discussion.  Then the floor will be open for questions from any participants.

We intend to use Skype with Google Hangouts as a backup in case of problems. All participants and attendees should have Google Chrome and gmail accounts in case we need to turn to Google Hangouts.

Participants not physically present at Marquette University for this event should indicate the desire to ask a question by sending a text message to Marquette organizers from inside Skype.

NOTE: ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST AGREE TO READ EACH OF THE CONFERENCE PAPERS. Again, note that papers will not be read at the conference since they are being distributed in advance to all participants. This will allow for more valuable discussion of the papers.



Requirements for those attending as observers

All observers should register via email at www.aquinasandthearabs.org.

Observers may request copies of the papers to prepare for the conference. Send your request to the email address mentioned immediately above. No papers will be distributed after 18 February 2015.



Required Technology Test


Take Special Note: All presenters will need to set up a test connection with Marquette on DATE TBA. We will use Skype technology. Participants need only have a computer (Mac or PC) with camera and a fast internet connection (university campus ethernet preferred) as well as Skype installed.

The Tech Test will take place at DATE TBA.


E-mail abstracts, completed papers and interest in commenting to:


muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com



Conference Organizers— TBA


Dr. Richard C. Taylor—Faculty Advisor—richard.taylor@marquette.edu


www.aquinasandthearabs.org


http://academic.mu.edu/taylorr/Aquinas_and_the_Arabs/Grad_Student_Workshop_2014.html

 

Final Schedule


Format

Presenters will have no more than 5-7 min. to present brief remarks indicating some of the key issues on which s/he would like discussion. The remaining time will be devoted to questions and comments by participants present online or in person. There will be a 5 min. break between presentations



Friday 20 February 2015 (Marquette Location: Raynor Library 320a):


9:30-10:25 AM Brett Yardley, “Social Epistemology and Communities of Faith: Is Aquinas’s Epistemic Division of Labor ‘Elitist Fideism’? Marquette University, Milwaukee


10:30- 11:25 AM Mark Schulz, “Plotinus and Avicenna on the First Principle”; Loyola Marymount University


11:30- 12:25 PM Catherine Peters, “Providence, Finality, and the Existence of God,” University of St. Thomas, Houston


12:30- 2:00 PM Lunch


2:00- 2:55 PM Traci Phillipson, “Boulēsis, Irādah, and Voluntas: The “Aristotelian” Conception of the Will in Medieval Arabic Philosophy” Marquette University, Milwaukee


3:00- 3:55 PM D.J. Hobbes, “The Physical Acts of Prayer in Avicenna and Aquinas” Marquette University, Milwaukee


4:00-4:55 PM Evan Williams, “The Subject(s) of Metaphysics in Book I, Question I of Scotus's Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle”, Marquette University, Milwaukee



Saturday 21 February 2015 (Marquette Location: Raynor Library 320a): 


10:30- 11:25 AM Jacob Andrews, “God as the Necessary Being in Avicenna and Aquinas,” Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium


11:30- 12:25 PM Alfonso Ganem “The Indirect Influence of Al-Farabi’s Logic in De Veritate q.2 a.12 of Thomas Aquinas,” National University in Mexico City, Mexico


12:30- 1:25 PM John Boyer “The Coherence of Divine Eternity in Thomas Aquinas,” University of St. Thomas, Houston


========================


Second On-Line International Live Video Graduate Student Group Workshop

13 - 14 March 2014*



(*Those whose papers are presented are awarded a free one year membership in the Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy.)


Call for Abstracts (completed)


Members of the Graduate Student Group of the Aquinas and the ‘Arabs’ International Working Group will be hosting an online graduate student conference on 13-14 March 2014. Ten presenters will have ~7 minutes each to summarize their papers.


Conference Format


Papers will be distributed to participants on 1 March 2014. Presenters will have no more than 5-7 min. to present brief remarks indicating some of the key issues on which s/he would like discussion. The remaining time will be devoted to questions and comments by participants present online or in person. There will be a 5 min. break between presentations and a two-hour break for lunch on Thursday and a one-hour break for lunch on Friday.


Application Procedure (completed)


Those interested in presenting must submit a 150 word abstract for a  ca. 4000-5000 word essay, notes separate,  by 7 February 2014. Papers may be on (i) Aquinas, (ii) Medieval Arabic philosophy, (iii) intersections between the two, or (iv) related topics. All submissions and comments must be in English.


Students with accepted abstracts will be notified on 12 February 2014.

Complete papers must be submitted no later than the deadline of 28 February 2014.

Please enter “Aquinas and the Arabs Graduate Conference Submission” in the subject-line of the e-mail.


All applications must be accompanied by a CV.



How to Participate as a Presenter

Presenters will have 7 minutes to indicate parts or issues of the paper on which they would like to receive comments or discussion.  Then the floor will be open for questions from any participants.

We intend to use MSLync with Google Hangouts as a backup in case of problems. All participants and attendees should have Google Chrome and gmail accounts in case we need to turn to Google Hangouts.

Participants not physically present at Marquette University for this event should indicate the desire to ask a question by sending a text message from inside MSLync or by sending an email to my email account: Richard.Taylor@hiw.kuleuven.be.

NOTE: ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST READ EACH OF THE CONFERENCE PAPERS. Papers will not be read at the conference since they are being distributed in advance to all particpants.



Requirements for those attending as observers

All observers should register with Daniel Adsett at www.aquinasandthearabs.org.

Observers may request copies of the papers to prepare for the conference. Send your request to the email address in the previous sentence. No papers will be distributed after 11 March.



Required Technology Test


Take Special Note: All presenters will need to set up a test connection with Marquette on 10 March 2014 at 10 am. We will use MSLync technology. Participants need only have a computer (Mac or PC) with camera and a fast internet connection (university campus ethernet preferred).

The Tech Test will take place at 10 am Monday 10 March 2014.

Procedures:

We will send the URL of the MSLync connection at 10:05 am Monday. Follow the directions to connect. Then be prepared to test the connection using Google Hangouts. Again, you must have a gmail account for Google Hangouts.




E-mail abstracts, completed papers and interest in commenting to:


muchapter.aquinasandthearabs@gmail.com




Daniel Adsett—Conference Organizer—daniel.adsett@marquette.edu


Dr. Mark Johnson—Faculty Advisor—mark.johnson@marquette.edu


Dr. Richard C. Taylor—Faculty Advisor—richard.taylor@marquette.edu


www.aquinasandthearabs.org


http://academic.mu.edu/taylorr/Aquinas_and_the_Arabs/Grad_Student_Workshop_2014.html

 

Schedule


NOTE: FOR EACH DAY THE INTERNET CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT 8:30 AM. NO NEW CONNECTIONS WILL BE MADE AFTER 9 AM BECAUSE THE CONFERENCE WILL BE IN PROGRESS.


Format

Presenters will have no more than 5-7 min. to present brief remarks indicating some of the key issues on which s/he would like discussion. The remaining time will be devoted to questions and comments by participants present online or in person. There will be a 5 min. break between presentations



Thursday 13 March 2014 (Marquette Location: Raynor Library 320a): 


9 - 9:55 am Milwaukee : Alfonso Ganem, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, Mexico. “Al-Fārābī on Foreknowledge and Contingency”


10 - 10:55 am Milwaukee :  Nicholas Oschman, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA. “The Prophets’ Knowledge of Future Particulars:  al-Farabi on the Metaphysical Status of the Determinacy of Future Events”


Break 11 am - 1 pm (For participants at Marquette, this is an opportunity to attend a meeting at this time of the KU Leuven Philosophy Review Club online live. Those interested are invited to bring a bag lunch.)


1:00-1:55 pm Milwaukee :  Daniel Adsett, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA. “Early and Late Aquinas on the Habitus of Prophecy: A Departure from Avicenna?”


2:00-2:55 pm Milwaukee :  Samuel A. Pomeroy, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium. “Accommodating Avicenna, Appropriating Augustine:  Towards an Assessment of the Sources for Thomas Aquinas’s Doctrine of Prophecy”


NOTE: FOR EACH DAY THE INTERNET CONNECTION WILL BE MADE AT 8:30 AM. NO NEW CONNECTIONS WILL BE MADE AFTER 9 AM BECAUSE THE CONFERENCE WILL BE IN PROGRESS.

DUE TO A PRESENTER DROPPING OUT, THE FRIDAY SCHEDULE HAS BEEN CHANGED.  NOTE THAT ON FRIDAY THE WORKSHOP WILL BE 9 AM - 12:55 PM WITHOUT LUNCH BREAK.


Friday 14 March 2014 (Marquette Location: Raynor Library 320a):


9 - 9:55 am Milwaukee : Dragana Jagusic, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium. “On the ‘boundary line’”


10 - 10:55 am Milwaukee :  Tracy Wietecha, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA.  “On Method in Reading the De Ente et Essentia


11 - 11:55 am Milwaukee :  Connor Borchert, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA. “Remarks on the Life of the Separated Soul”


12 -12:55 : Paul Turack, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA. “The Sociology and Metaphysics of Unbelief in Averroes’ Distinction of Discourse




Abstracts in alphabetical order


Daniel Adsett, Marquette University

“Early and Late Aquinas on the Habitus of Prophecy: A Departure from Avicenna?”

Between writing his Summa Theologiae and De Veritate, it seems as though Thomas Aquinas changed his mind as to whether prophecy is a habitus. In the former and later work, Aquinas seems to categorically deny the possibility of prophecy being a habitus while in the latter and earlier work, his opinion is much more ambivalent. This essays asks (1) whether Aquinas did in fact change his mind and (2) if so, why. Ultimately, it is argued that Aquinas does reconsider whether prophecy is a habitus. It is suggested that, over the course of his career, he wanted to distance himself from Avicenna’s naturalized theory of prophecy. Hence, if Aquinas wanted to distinguish himself from the Islamic philosopher earlier in his career, as Dag Nikolaus Hasse suggests, he separated himself even more so later on.


Connor Borchert, Marquette University


“Remarks on the Life of the Separated Soul”


In Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae, he argues that the human intellect can only know singulars by returning to the phantasms, something the separated soul after death but before the resurrection cannot have because it lacks a body. Yet Aquinas needs to make room for the separated soul’s knowledge of singulars and not leave it in a completely confused state in order to account for the agony of sinners in hell, the intercession of the saints on behalf of souls on earth, and overall the soul’s knowledge of itself. Aquinas therefore makes room for singulars in four ways: “to which they are determined by former knowledge in this life, or by some affection, or by natural aptitude, or by the disposition of the Divine Order” (ST I, Q89 A4 Body). I explore what these ways imply and how they all rely on God’s universal application of grace.



Alfonso Ganem, Universidad Panamericana


“Al-Fārābī on Foreknowledge and Contingency”


Arabic philosophers knew several versions of the conflict between determinism and free will coming from the Greek tradition, from deterministic positions such as that of the Stoics, to compatibilist positions such as that of the Peripatetics. Al-Fārābī’s approach to this difficulty introduces relevant nuances. The aim of this paper is precisely to reconstruct and analyze Al-Fārābī’s compatibilist argument as is presented in the second section of his Long Commentary on Peri Hermeneias. There, Al-Fārābī argues for the compatibility between the epistemic access of the First Cause to future events and the contingent nature of sublunary events. The argument can be presented as a dilemma: the first horn sustains that the actions of sublunar substances cannot be determined because of a “principle of contingency” that characterizes their nature; the second horn defends the epistemic privilege of a God whose omnipotence let him know everything that exists in reality without any deficiency or indeterminacy.



Dragana Jagusic, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven


“On the ‘boundary line’”


Essay aims to (re) determine the metaphysical status of the soul in Aquinas’ Summa Contra Gentiles and Quaestiones Disputatate De Anima. It uses the method which could be called  “fight Aquinas with Aquinas” as it highlights the passages in which Aquinas, as his own opponent, gives alternative views to his well established doctrine of the substantial unity of the body and soul and shows how can they provide the foundation for its reconstruction.

The axis of this essay is Summa Contra Gentiles (2.80-81.12) which indicates there are two types of understanding that correlate to the composite and separate substance, implying that the body and soul, when separated, indeed have a separate being. Although the soul as a separate substance has an operation which is entirely separated from the body, this is not the operation to which Aquinas gives his full attention and from which he draws his final conclusion.  This passage, however, gives enough evidence that the metaphysics of the composite substances cannot at all times and in all circumstances be applied to the human (rational) soul, which, taken separately from the body,  must be given its right to be a hoc aliquid.



Nick Oschman, Marquette University


“The Prophets’ Knowledge of Future Particulars:

al-Farabi on the Metaphysical Status of the Determinacy of Future Events”


Within the Farabian corpus, al-Farabi takes two seemingly distinct stances on the determinacy of future particulars. He explicitly affirms that the prophets can know future particulars, thus affirming the determinacy of future particulars in general, in Mabādi’ ārā’ ahl al-madīnat al-fādilah. Elsewhere, when he deals with the issue directly in Sharh al-Fārābī li-kitāb Aristūtālīs Fī al-’Ibārah, addressing the Principle of Bivalence, he denies the determinacy of future particulars (at least in regard to propositions which involve human action). I argue that given his cosmology, al-Farabi is able to both deny the metaphysical determinacy of future particulars which relate to human action, and accommodate the determinacy of nature beyond human influence. While generally future particulars are indeterminate, for al-Farabi there are some future matters which the prophets can know, namely those matters which will exist without fail and contingent matters which are beyond human influence and necessarily follow from already determined particulars.



Samuel A. Pomeroy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven


“Accommodating Avicenna, Appropriating Augustine:

Towards an Assessment of the Sources for Thomas Aquinas’s Doctrine of Prophecy”


In this paper I argue that Aquinas’s doctrine of prophecy develops from the early period (De uer. q. 12, a. 1, prophecy is a habit) to his more mature articulation (ST IIa‐IIae q. 171, a. 2, prophecy is not a habit) as a result of his complex handling of the metaphysical thought of Avicenna. Aquinas subtly distances himself from the implication of Avicenna’s emanationist framework for prophecy, namely that prophetic knowledge is acquired through perfected intellectual habit. Yet at the same time he accommodates this aspect insofar as it aligns with Augustine’s biblical neo‐Platonism. He does so, as I shall demonstrate, with Augustine’s notion of prayer (orandi) as a kind of inquiry (disputatio) that disposes the soul to aptly receive the prophetic light by the extension of grace. In this, Aquinas incorporates Avicenna’s notion of prophetic habit without committing to the emanationist model from which it arises.



Paul Turack, Marquette University


“The Sociology and Metaphysics of Unbelief in Averroes’ Distinction of Discourse


I explicate a subtlety operative in Averroes’ Distinction of Discourse: “unbelief” is differentiated correlative to the degree of one’s philosophical aptitude.  The “unbelief” in those who are inept at philosophical discourse takes the form of a confusion regarding the legitimacy of the apparent sense of scripture and doctrine.  Such confusion impedes their assent to God, confusion being a corruption of the means for non-philosophical assent. The “unbelief” of those who are adept at the practice of philosophy, however, is the activity of causing this confusion in others.  Through corrupting the potential of non-philosophers for assent to God, the philosopher is also culpable of “unbelief,” albeit of a different kind. What is most striking is that this corruption is the very activity of indiscriminately disseminating philosophy! In this paper I utilize the recognition of the heterogeneity of “unbelief” in order to better explicate the sociological concerns and metaphysical problems considered in Averroes’ Distinction of Discourse.



Tracy Wietecha, Marquette University


“On Method in Reading the De Ente et Essentia

 

In this paper I explore methodological approaches to Aquinas’ argument for a real distinction between essence and existence in creatures in De Ente et Essentia.  Joseph Owens and John Wippel examine the text through three stages which, they conclude, result in a demonstration for the real distinction.  I contrast this approach with R.E. Houser, who argues that Aquinas’ text, which proceeds dialectically, must be understood within the context of its sources, namely Avicenna’s Metaphysics of the Healing and The Intentions of the Philosophers by al-Ghazali.  I will come to two adjudications: first I will offer an evaluative judgment on Owen’s and Wippel’s disagreement on which stage Aquinas demonstrates a real distinction; second I will offer an evaluative judgment on the nature of the treatise as a whole, ultimately arguing for the methodology of source based contextualism which studies a text within the context of the sources used to produce the text.





=============================


First On-Line International Live Video Graduate Student Group Workshop 21-22 March 2013



Thursday 21 March 2013 (Marquette Location: Coughlin 238): Avicenna & Aquinas.


10 - 10:55 am Milwaukee : Catherine Peters, University of St Thomas, Houston, “The Caused Necessity of Creatures in Avicenna’s Metaphysics of the Healing


11 - 11:55 am Milwaukee:  Paloma Hernández-Ribio, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, “The Fear of the Lambs: Nature and Origin of intentiones non sensatas in Avicenna’s Liber de Anima


12 - 12:55 am Milwaukee: Nathan Blackerby, Marquette University, Milwaukee, “The Form/Essence Distinction in Aquinas’s Account of Human Nature”


1 -1:55 am Milwaukee: John Skalko, University of St Thomas, Houston, “Avicenna’s Argument Against Infinite Regress in The Metaphysics of the Healing As A Step In Proving The Existence of God: Is It Successful?”

Friday 22 March 2013 (Marquette Location: To Be Announced): Averroes & Aquinas


10 - 10:55 am Milwaukee: Katja Krause, King’s College London, “Enhanced for Ultimate Knowledge: Aquinas’ Latin and Arabic Sources for Explaining the Light of Glory”.


11 - 11:55 am Milwaukee: Traci Phillipson, Marquette University & Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, “The Will in Averroes and Aquinas”.


12 - 12:55 am Milwaukee: Nicholas Oschman, Marquette University, “The Role of Desire and Hylomorphism in Aquinas’s Argument from Motion”