![Anthony F. Peressini [Anthony F. Peressini]](AFP_files/AFP.jpg)
Professor
Department
of Philosophy
Marquette
University
Email: anthony.peressini@marquette.edu
Phone: (414) 288-5683
Office: 423 Marquette Hall
I work in philosophy of mind & consciousness, science, mathematics, and also as a researcher in psychology and data science. I am currently working on a large and ongoing project in natural language processing and machine learning in radiology. Philosophically I am especially interested in the relationship between science, scientific results and philosophical theorizing. I've been at Marquette since 1994 and before that studied at the University of Wisconsin-Madison . . . and way back at Montana State University.
More information: publications · teaching · CV · links · software
Abstract: I reconsider the ‘working day’ discussion in Das Kapital (Ch. 10) and how it centre’s two parameters in the generation and appropriation of surplus value. The first parameter is the cost of labour-power paid by the capitalist and the second is the time that the worker must yield to the capitalist – the ‘length of the working day.’ The first parameter represents the amount of pay required to keep the worker alive and able to work. Marx understood it as a lower limit below which capitalism would cease to function. I argue here that, while analytically coherent, this understanding of a lower limit runs contrary to many ways that actual historical capitalism has found to exploit the working class. That in fact, capitalism regularly exceeds this limit, and in this sense hyper-exploits. What we find instead of a limit are racialized gradients of human value – generated and fostered by capitalism – in which there are regular and persisting areas of hyper-exploitation with devalued racialized gendered workers. Supplemented by the notion of gradients of human value, Marx’s two-parameter account with its unifying analytic of time, in particular, human-time, neatly encompasses the phenomenon of hyper-exploitation and provides an incisive analysis of today’s capitalist exploitation. (Forthcoming in 2025.)
Abstract: This paper critiques philosophical efforts to biologize race as racial projects (Omi and Winant, Racial Formation in the United States). The paper argues that the deeply social phenomenon of race defies the analytic schema employed by biologizing philosophers. The very (social) act of theorizing race is already in an involuted relationship with its target concept: analyzing race must be seen as a racial project, in that it simultaneously helps to manage how race is represented in society and helps organize society’s resources along particular racial lines. Such biologizing projects are rife with moral and political dimensions and have a depoliticizing effect that has the potential to camouflage, defuse, or explain away the social-structural reproduction of white power/privilege. The paper begins by considering two recent philosophic-scientific biologizations of race, showing how they conform to the analytic schema, reviewing received critical points, and offering several novel ones.
(Access it here.) [Wiley Publishing, shareable link version, August 23, 2021].
My other publications can be found on my publications page.