NURSING 209
CREATING NURSING CARE SYSTEMS
Summer 2000
Final Paper Guidelines - Cooperative
Learning
Syllabus
| Schedule
| Grading
| Evaluation/Participation/Discussion
| Logs
| Selected
References | NURS
209 Webforum | Peer
Review
This paper will allow students to fully analyze a
specific system (potentially one in which the student may
work in the future) from the perspective of a specific role
(NP, CNM, CNS, Manager, Administrator, Leader). Students
will work in groups of TWO to submit ONE paper that will
receive ONE grade. If students want to negotiate working
alone, or in groups of three, this will need to be
negotiated and approved by the instructor EARLY in the
course. It is recommended that you work with another student
who has similar goals (e.g. CNM, NP, CNS, Administrator).
- Describe the following dimensions of your
particular system and identify the consequences
for this organization related to the dimensions using
knowledge you have gained from the literature and
course content. (For example, if the system you are
describing is a staff-HMO, primary care clinic in an
urban environment with a majority of reimbursement coming
from Medicaid and private pay, what does that mean for
the provider, for the client, for the quality and access,
given what is stated in the literature?) (10
pts)
- Type of system (e.g. government, public,
private, for profit;acute; long term care; primary
care);
- Regulation/Policy influences (include govermental,
accrediting bodies, and other)
- Relationship to larger health care system (e.g.
independent, part of integrated delivery system, part
of continuum of care, payors, market share and
competitiveness)
- Patient mix & Financing influences (e.g.
diversity, payor mix, continuum of health services
<Barton, p5>)
- Types of Programs/Product (Product Lines, Disease
Management)
- Organizational design (from Mintzberg)-- How is
work coordinated and what are consequences
- Leadership roles available for clinicians and
administrators/managers
- Basic underlying assumption or "espoused theory"
of organization's mission
- Cost, access (equity) and quality issues (how does
this system address? What is your analysis of how they
address? What quality endeavors do they or should they
have?)
- Present the IDEAL role you are analyzing and include
the following dimensions as well as the OBSTACLES that
may be present in achieving this ideal: (5 pts.)
Reference literature where appropriate:
- Job title and description (if
available)
- Location within the organizational chart
- Key organizational relationships (e.g. MDs, RNs,
Administrators)
- Relationship with
patients/enrollees/consumers/payers (direct or
indirect)
- Requirements for job (e.g. education,
credentialing, experience)
- Circle of influence of this role (what leverage
could this role have in the organization to effect
quality and equity of care)
- What intrapreneurial or entrepreneurial endeavors
may be available to this type of role
- Potential of role expansion
- Involvement in quality endeavors
- Strengths and weaknesses of this role
- Involvement in emerging models of care
delivery
THESE FIRST TWO PARTS ARE DUE FOR PEER REVIEW AND
INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK ON JUNE 19TH (HAND IN THREE
COPIES, TWO FOR PEER REVIEW AND ONE FOR
INSTRUCTOR; if three people are working on paper
than hand in four copies, three for peers and one for
instructor).
- Given the material covered in this systems course,
demonstrate how knowledge of the concepts covered in this
course including systems thinking, leadership,
conflict resolution, change theory, and group
dynamics can maximize your leverage in this new
system, and overcome the obstacles identified in Part II
above. (14 pts) Remember to utilize and reference
literature. For example, you might demonstrate a
scenario related to increasing collaboration with
physician partners, or your administrative team so
outcomes might be enhanced. You might identify how to
utilize your knowledge to enhance group functioning among
diverse members and thus improve team functioning. You
might identify a 'potential problem' to be anticipated in
this setting and identify how you would maximize your
leverage for high quality outcomes. Make sure to identify
your circle of influence vs your circle of concern.
- Summary:A self reflection of your own learning and
journey of enlightenment during this semester of new
readings, new insights, and new relationships of
collaborative inquiry. (1 point)
NOTE: Many people have trouble with WRITING in their
first graduate courses. The Writing Center is available on
campus and it is strongly encouraged that you seek their
assistance if you struggle with writing. It will be required
to synthesize and reference the literature from this course
in your paper. DO NOT USE EXCESSIVE QUOTES!!!!! You need to
synthesize, integrate and apply NOT MERELY SUMMARIZE or
QUOTE.
FINAL PAPER DUE June 28th, 2000 . Grades will be
due July 3rd so there is very little time and thus no
opportunities for late papers. Any paper not received by
June 28th will be given an Incomplete grade for the course
(see bulletin for Incomplete guidelines) ** Paper should be
typed according to APA format (1994 APA manual available in
the bookstore). The APA format provides direction for
citation of sources, bibliography format, grammar, use of
punctuation, and typing guidelines. PLEASE PROOF READ YOUR
PAPER! (Length is variable, but as a guideline 15-25 pages
is range; after 30 pages I STOP reading!)
Syllabus
| Schedule
| Grading
| Evaluation/Participation/Discussion
| Logs
| Selected
References | NURS
209 Webforum | Peer
Review
<
Nursing
209 Syllabus
©2000
Marquette
University
-- Last Update: April 28, 2000
|